leica m240 vs m262 image quality

The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . Given my choice to upgrade to the M10, possibly the most pertinent issue with the ISO settings is the inability to set or see the chosen ISO without pressing a button and looking at the back of the camera. You can set minimum shutter speed either specifically, or based on the lens mounted. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. With its excellent dynamic range, beautiful colors, and compact design, it won a lot of fans, but perhaps not . This is an inspiring and generous website. Value for money, incredible quality. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. I did the same thing Hamish, never having handled the M10. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. A few years later I sold all my Nikon DLSR kit and switched to Sony full frame A7 cameras and began to realise just how useful it can be. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! It depends on your needs. (Leica M Typ 240), Nikon D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, Sony a6600 + Sony E 18-135mm F3__5-5__6 OSS, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSS, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. It was that feeling that having less kit would do me good This became the excuse I needed to change up to the M10. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. I remember having an unexpected opportunity to fondle the M10, when it was first promoted, when a Leica rep. happened to visit my favorite camera shop. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. As I understand technically m240 is similar to m262 (only some features, but not sensor). I use along the two M240/262/etc. The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. Pera I think you might be giving a little to much benefit of the doubt there . The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. Keep forgetting about that. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Seems I do once again. Ive got a 262 and I really like the fact that its completely stripped back to just the basics. One has a brightline window, the other does not. Youve often been a voice of reason in my ear on this website, John. Compared to the M9 Ive found less of a problem with magenta shift, especially in skin tones, though its fair to say the bias is still toward magenta as opposed the the green bias I found in my Sonys especially the older and cheapest ones that had frankly horrible colour-science. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. A fetish with the M10 is its simplified menu. If not, get the 262. Display as a link instead, Thanks a lot for your replies. I like to do a lot of still lifeand some close-up and macro work. Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. Compared Usage Recommendations More. BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. And then I got a Sony A7riii that lets me touch the screen to pick the subject I want the camera to autofocus on! 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. The M9 and CCD sensor. Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. Functionalism be damned. Jordan's twin brother Gordon is back to review the cinema-focused Canon EOS R5 C! Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. We were using the Sony cameras for video, so as I often do, I was shooting stills with the Leica. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, Pera. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 Ha!Have you ever read my Fuji X100f review I think you might enjoy it.https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/. USA Distributor of MCM Equipment leica m240 vs m262 image quality Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! Forget is a strong word. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . The WB white balance button is completely redundant by my measure. Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and computers. "It has the same image quality as the Leica M 240" was the . . Continue with Recommended Cookies. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. In fact, apart from INFO button/screen which reports battery and SD card information, and the play and delete buttons, the ISO button and the menu it brings up is really the only part of the screen-based interface I use. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. Nice review.I bought a m262 this year when one of my pensions surprisingly came out.I wanted1] a digital leica m2] no video3] no live view4] no EVFBut i like to sometimes review a pic when i am out and about.The 262 is perfect for me and i love it.with the m-e 240 being announced i have noticed that used 262 cameras have already dropped in price so its possible i can buy a dream 2nd body.Meaning another 262. There are two things to be separated here. And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. With sensor shift, the image sensor (rather than the lens) moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. Literally. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. For example, I am in a coffee shop with the camera sitting on a Manfrotto table top tripod. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. To begin with, I tried put the idea to the back of my mind, then one day I opened the cupboard a saw my Monochrom sat there looking underused. The sensor is not the same, by the way. The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. Your previous content has been restored. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. Upload or insert images from URL. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. (they really have me suckered in dont they?!). It does take lovely photos however and I dont mind using I most of the time but. I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. Unfortunately, this isnt something thats fixed by the M10 either though I am definitely looking forward to how much the M10 improves manual ISO control for me. Without a magnifier piececomfortable view is 50-35mm. Yura, I still use both with other M along. You'd be wise to buy the best/latest digital body you can afford and leave a healthy budget for the best/most lenses possible. I have used many rangefinders, a Leica M8, M9 (and its variants M-E/M9P/MM), M262, M240P and of course most recently the M-D 262. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. It only having felt right once in 6 months felt wrong. Hello Hamish,Great writeup. Source: DxOMark. You cannot paste images directly. Of course it didnt. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. I hadnt noticed that it focused closer though. Having run the gamut of all the Ms, Ive settled on these two as my main M system and I suggest to others who cant shake the M bug to do something similar. Thats why the M-D 262 and the M 262 have the same type name. . There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. Ive had it for a month now. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. This thing has live-view, and video. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. Some cards are woefully slow. This happens with the M240 from time to time. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. This friendly dig on Facebook from Alex Hakimi somewhat sums up how ridiculous all this really is: if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); Anyway, the point is, at one stage, not all that long ago, I was very happy with the M262 and didnt really feel like the M10 could possibly bring any advantages to me. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. We have the top best product and truth reviews that will help make your decision easy. The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. Reduction of features is something no other brand of cameras shouts about, ever. The fix is to remove the bottom plate and remove the battery, but this is not a solution for when the decisive moment is at hand.Low Light Performance. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. I like Roger a lot hes written for this site before, and we chatted a fair bit around the time. Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. This is the reason I was so keen not to be without one for a few months so when the M240 didnt initially seem all that different to the M262 I was really pleased!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_12',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); This relief quickly turned to intrigue. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. Have a read of this for tips. The menu is cut and dry. Unknown. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. I currently own a 262. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. By There is still some faint banding, but a huge improvement over the M240. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. Thanks, James. It might be a step backwards in volume of features, but it was a step in the right direction in terms what I think a Leica camera should stand for. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. It then required a short trip to camera-hospital in Germany. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . Its. Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. Great pictures and very interesting.